Color Doppler Ultrasound Indices as Predictors of Propranolol Response in Infantile Hemangioma: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of color Doppler ultrasonography in assessing infantile hemangioma response to treatment with oral propranolol. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between January, 2016 and December, 2022, wherein children with symptomatic (ulceration, bleeding, pain and scarring) infantile hemangioma were given oral propranol (2 mg/kg per day in three divided doses) as outpatient therapy. The clinical response was assessed three months post-initiation of treatment (intermediate clinical response) and three months post-completion of treatment (final clinical response, FCR). The primary outcome measurement was a clinical and radiological response (resistivity index (RI), pulsatility index (PI) and peak systolic velocity) to treatment. The secondary outcomes assessed were the complications related to treatment. RESULTS: Out of 601 patients who were started on propranolol, 99 developed severe adverse effects and were excluded from analysis. At FCR assessment, out of 502 participants, 64.3% (n = 323) showed excellent response, 17.7% (n = 89) showed partial, and 17.9% (n = 90) were non-responders. A significant increase in RI and PI values was noted in all children following propranolol treatment for six months. An increase > 7.5% in RI could identify responders with 92% sensitivity, 91% specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.963. An increase of > 11.5% in PI could identify responders with 86% sensitivity, 91% specificity and AUC of 0.896. Patients initially showing no response but later becoming excellent responders had significantly higher RI and PI values. CONCLUSIONS: Color Doppler ultrasonography is a valuable tool in predicting the treatment outcome of infantile hemangioma using propranolol.

Immediate Reaction to Propranolol: An Extremely Rare but Important Condition. A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Beta-blockers involve a group of drugs widely used nowadays. Propranolol was the first beta-blocker available in the market. It is the most prescribed first-generation betablocker and is commonly used. Beta-blocker allergy is extremely unusual. Only an isolated case of an urticaria reaction to propranolol has been published in 1975. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 44-year-old man. In 2016, he was treated with a daily dose of 5 mg of propranolol prescribed for a diagnosis of essential tremor. On the third day of medical treatment, he experienced an episode of generalized urticaria directly related to the administration of propranolol. He continued with his habitual treatment and he had no other urticaria episodes. A drug provocation test was carried out with gradually increasing doses of the culprit drug. Thirty minutes after a total cumulative dose of 5 mg, the patient had several hives on the chest, abdominal region and arms. Two weeks later, a new drug provocation test was performed to bisoprolol as an alternative beta-blocker, with good tolerance. CONCLUSION: We describe a new case of urticaria secondary to propranolol, presenting as an immediate hypersensitivity reaction. Bisoprolol has been succesfully proved to be a safe option. Bisoprolol is a second-generation beta-blocker, it is available and commercialized worldwide, which makes it a good alternative.

Additive value of single intralesional bleomycin injection to propranolol in the management of proliferative infantile hemangioma.

BACKGROUND: /Objective: We aimed to evaluate whether additional intralesional bleomycin injections benefit children with proliferative infantile hemangiomas (IHs). METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, we examined the medical records of 216 infants who were followed up for proliferative IH. Patients in group 1 were treated with propranolol orally at 2 mg/kg/day. Group 2 was treated with oral propranolol combined with intralesional bleomycin injections. RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 95 and 121 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. No significant differences were observed between both groups regarding visiting age, sex, lesion thickness, or risk site. The overall cure rates in groups 1 and 2 were 77.89% (74/95) and 84.30% (102/121), respectively. The overall distribution of the length of cure significantly differed between both groups (P = 0.035). From the survival analysis (P = 0.026), the median survival time was 198 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 174.46-221.54) for group 1 and 139 days (95% CI 114.58-163.42) for group 2. The effect of treatment modality (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.41, P = 0.031) and risk site on survival time (HR = .54, P < 0.001) was significant. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in the resolution of proliferative IH; however, intralesional bleomycin injection with systemic propranolol for proliferative IH treatment may provide a more rapid resolution.

Effect of propranolol on temporomandibular joint pain in repeatedly stressed rats.

Stress substantially increases the risk of developing painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) by influencing the release of endogenous catecholamines. Propranolol, an antagonist of ß-adrenergic receptors, has shown potential in alleviating TMD-associated pain, particularly when the level of catecholamines is elevated. The aim of this study was to explore whether intra-articular propranolol administration is effective in diminishing temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain during repeated stress situations. Additionally, we investigated the effect of repeated stress on the expression of genes encoding ß-adrenoceptors in the trigeminal ganglion. In the present study, rats were exposed to a stress protocol induced by sound, then to the administration of formalin in the TMJ (to elicit a nociceptive response), followed immediately afterward by different doses of propranolol, after which the analgesic response to propranolol was evaluated. We also assessed the levels of beta-1 and beta-2 adrenergic receptor mRNAs (Adrb1 and Adrb2, respectively) using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Our findings revealed that propranolol administration reduces formalin-induced TMJ nociception more effectively in stressed rats than in non-stressed rats. Furthermore, repeated stress decreases the expression of the Adrb2 gene within the trigeminal ganglion. The findings of this study are noteworthy as they suggest that individuals with a chronic stress history might find potential benefits from ß-blockers in TMD treatment.

Exploration of the optimal time to discontinue propranolol treatment in infantile hemangiomas: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Relapse of infantile hemangiomas after withdrawal from propranolol treatment is common. Early withdrawal is believed to increase the risk of relapse. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the optimal time to discontinue propranolol treatment for infantile hemangiomas. METHODS: A prospective study conducted at a tertiary referral center. RESULTS: Compared to withdrawal after 1-month maintenance treatment, withdrawal after 3-month maintenance, corresponding achieving maximum regression of infantile hemangiomas, was associated with a lower major relapse rate (P = .041). The relapse (P = .055) and adverse event rates (P = .154) between the 2 withdrawal modes were not statistically significant. Compared with direct withdrawal, the relapse (P = .396), major relapse (P = .963), and adverse event rates (P = .458) of gradual withdrawal were not statistically different. Patients with/without relapse could be best distinguished according to whether withdrawal followed a 3-month maintenance and age >13 months (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.603). Patients with/without major relapse could be best distinguished according to whether withdrawal was accompanied by 3-month maintenance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.610). LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study are nonrandomization and single-center design. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal propranolol withdrawal time to avoid relapse is when the patient is aged >13 months and the lesion has maintained for 3 months after reaching maximum regression, while the optimal time to prevent major relapse is after 3 months of maintenance.

Oral atenolol compared to oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma. / Atenolol oral comparado con propranolol oral para hemangioma infantil.

Introduction: Infantile hemangioma is the most frequent benign vascular tumor in childhood, with an incidence of 3 to 10%. When patients require treatment, oral propranolol, a non-selective lipophilic beta-blocker, is usually considered the therapy of choice. However, its use has been associated with several adverse events related to its ß-2 action and its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Because of this, oral atenolol, a hydrophilic ß-1 receptor-selective beta-blocker, may represent a valid treatment alternative. Nonetheless, there is still controversy regarding the efficacy and safety of atenolol when compared with propranolol as monotherapy for this condition. Methods: We searched Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health science, which is maintained by screening multiple sources of information, including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, among others. Data were extracted from the identified reviews, data from the primary studies were analyzed, a meta-analysis was performed, and a summary table of the results was prepared using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Results: Nine systematic reviews were identified, including 10 primary studies and three randomized trials. The three randomized trials were included in the analysis of this investigation. Conclusion: The use of oral atenolol compared with oral propranolol as monotherapies may result in little or no difference in terms of likelihood of complete remission, decrease in Hemangioma Activity Score, likelihood of post-treatment relapse, and risk of adverse events and severe adverse events, in infantile hemangioma (low certainty of evidence).

Introducción: El hemangioma infantil corresponde al tumor vascular benigno más frecuente de la infancia, con una incidencia de 3 a 10%. Entre los pacientes que requieren tratamiento el uso oral de propranolol, un betabloqueador no selectivo de tipo lipofílico, es usualmente considerado como la terapia de elección. Sin embargo, su uso se ha asociado a diversos efectos adversos, relacionados con su acción ß-2, y a su capacidad de cruzar la barrera hematoencefálica. Debido a esto, el uso oral de atenolol, un betabloqueador selectivo de receptores ß-1, de tipo hidrofílico, podría representar una alternativa válida de tratamiento. Sin embargo, aún existe controversia en relación con la eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento con atenolol como monoterapia, en comparación con el uso de propranolol como monoterapia para esta condición. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el tamizaje de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Se extrajeron los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, se analizaron los datos de los estudios primarios, se realizó un metanálisis y se preparó una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Resultados: Se identificaron nueve revisiones sistemáticas, que en conjunto incluyeron 10 estudios primarios y tres ensayos aleatorizados. Se incluyeron los tres ensayos aleatorizados en el análisis del presente trabajo. Conclusiones: El uso de atenolol oral como monoterapia, comparado con el uso de propranolol oral como monoterapia, podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en cuanto a la probabilidad de remisión completa, la disminución del , la probabilidad de recaída posterior al tratamiento y el riesgo de presentar efectos adversos y efectos adversos severos, en el hemangioma infantil (certeza de la evidencia baja).

Excessively High Chronic Propranolol Overdose in Infantile Hemangioma: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Infantile hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors of childhood, occurring in approximately 5% of infants. Oral propranolol at 2 to 3 mg/kg daily is recommended for systemic treatment of high-risk infantile hemangiomas. Multiple propranolol formulations exist, and propranolol overdose can occur due to improper patient counseling. Propranolol acute toxicity in the pediatric population and its management are well described in the literature. However, data are lacking on chronic propranolol overdose and how to manage it, with the awareness that abrupt discontinuation of therapeutic doses of propranolol can lead to rebound sinus tachycardia. CASE REPORT A 7-month-old girl was prescribed a therapeutic dose of propranolol (1 mg/kg/day) to treat infantile hemangioma. However, due to an administration error, the patient received approximately 8 times the recommended dose (7.6 mg/kg/day for 2 months, then increased to 15.5 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks) and, surprisingly, remained asymptomatic. Her electrocardiogram was normal, and all routine laboratory tests were within the reference range. Propranolol was successfully tapered over 3 weeks by reducing the dose by 50% weekly until it reached the therapeutic dose. After tapering, the patient was asymptomatic, with a mild increase in hemangioma size. After 6 weeks of the therapeutic dose, the hemangioma was fading away. CONCLUSIONS This case is one of the few cases reported in the literature of high, chronic propranolol overdose in pediatric patients. The patient remained asymptomatic, and the overdose was successfully managed with gradual tapering over several weeks. This case report can serve as a guide in managing subsequent cases.

Intralesional betamethasone versus oral propranolol for localized infantile hemangiomas of the lip.

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) of the lips are associated with an increased risk of incomplete involution and ulceration, causing disfigurement. Treatment with oral propranolol (OPT) has credible efficacy but takes months to complete. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intralesional betamethasone injection (IBI) as an alternative treatment for protruding localized IHs of the lips. To investigate the efficacies of OPT and IBI, we designed a prospective, noninferiority, parallel-group study. The primary outcome assessed was treatment response rate. Secondary outcome assessments included lesion size changes and surgical rate. Additionally, complication rates and treatment durations of OPT and IBI were compared. The treatment response rate of IBI was not inferior to that of OPT (95.7% vs. 76.0%, respectively; a difference of 19.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.4% to 41.6%). The average surgical rate in the IBI group was significantly lower than that in the OPT group (8.7% vs. 40%, respectively; p = 0.012), and the average duration of treatment for IBI was shorter than that of OPT (2.1 months vs. 6.3 months, respectively; p < 0.001). There were no severe adverse drug events in either group. If not managed properly, small, localized lip IHs may cause disfigurement in a child. Our study demonstrated that IBI is as effective as OPT in treating protruding localized lip IHs. Moreover, IBI treatment has a shorter duration and lower surgical rate than OPT. With proper care, IBI is an effective treatment modality for small and localized lip IHs.

Propranolol for the treatment of infantile hemangiomas: a nine-year monocentric experience from a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Propranolol is currently considered the first-line therapy for problematic infantile hemangiomas (IH), the most common benign vascular neoplasm of infancy. OBJECTIVES: We present a retrospective observational study aimed at assessing the efficacy of propranolol in 44 IH patients. MATERIALS & METHODS: A nine-year retrospective review considering clinicodemographical and therapy-related variables was performed on medical records of infants treated for IH with oral propranolol. Each lesion was assessed through a numeric severity score based on size and colour both at baseline and after treatment conclusion (p <0.05 was considered statistically significant). RESULTS: Complete remission was achieved in 90.7% cases of IH with a general mean improvement in severity of 94.94%. No severe adverse effects were reported. Preterm patients showed a superior response compared to term infants, even though the difference was not significant (p=0.185). CONCLUSION: Propranolol showed high efficacy in terms of safety profile and cosmetic results. Prematurity and precocious therapy could be linked to a superior response.

Efficacy and adverse events of anthracycline and propranolol combination in five dogs with stage 3 hemangiosarcoma.

Background: Canine hemangiosarcoma (HSA), which originates from endothelial cells, is one of the most common malignant neoplasms that frequently develop metastatic lesions. Although anthracycline-based HSA treatment strategies have been widely investigated, reliable therapy for dogs with clinically advanced-stage HSA (stage 3 HSA) has not been established yet. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that propranolol, a beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist, exhibits anti-tumor effects against tumors originating from vascular endothelial cells, indicating the possibility that propranolol is a candidate adjunctive agent for anthracycline-based therapy in dogs with stage 3 HSA. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of anthracycline and propranolol combination in stage 3 HSA-affected dogs. Case Description: We retrospectively investigated five dogs diagnosed with stage 3 HSA which were administered with both anthracycline and propranolol during the same period between January 2020 and August 2021. Clinical benefit was observed in four of five HSA dogs (one of complete response, one of partial response, and two of stable disease) with gross metastatic lesions by anthracycline and propranolol combination. Notably, some or all of the metastatic lesions were reduced in two cases. In all five dogs administered with anthracycline and propranolol combination, no serious and irreversible AEs were observed. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the efficacy and safety of anthracycline and propranolol combination in stage 3 HSA-affected dogs. Further studies are needed to establish treatment protocols based on anthracycline and propranolol combination for dogs with advanced HSA.

Predictors of poor response to oral propranolol in infantile hemangiomas.

BACKGROUND: Propranolol is the first-line treatment for infantile hemangiomas (IH). Cases of propranolol-resistant infantile hemangiomas are rarely reported. The purpose of our study was to investigate the predictive factors for poor response to propranolol. METHODS: A prospective analytical study was conducted between January 2014 and January 2022 including all patients with IH who received oral propranolol therapy at a dose of 2-3 mg/kg/day maintained for at least 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients with IH were treated with oral propranolol. Poor response was reported in 18 (13.4%) of the patients: 72% were girls and 28% were boys. Overall, 84% of the IH were mixed, and hemangiomas were multiple in three cases (16%), nasal tip hemangiomas accounted for four cases (22%), and 15 patients (83%) had segmental hemangiomas. There was no significant association between the age or sex of the children and type of response to treatment (p > 0.05). No significant association was found between the type of hemangioma and the therapeutic outcome as well as the recurrence after treatment discontinuation (p > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that nasal tip hemangiomas, multiple hemangiomas, and segmental hemangiomas were at greater risk of poor response to beta-blockers (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Poor response to propranolol therapy has rarely been reported in the literature. In our series, it was approximately 13.4%. To our knowledge, no previous publications have focused on the predictive factors of poor response to beta-blockers. However, the reported risk factors for recurrence are discontinuation of treatment before 12 months of age, mixed or deep type IH, and female gender. In our study, the predictive factors for poor response were multiple type IH, segmental type IH, and location on the nasal tip.

Cardiac side effects of propranolol in infants treated for infantile haemangiomas.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to add proof to the safety profile of propranolol as first-line choice in treating infantile haemangiomas, in particular related to its cardiac side effects the main hindering reason for parents and physicians to start and comply with treatment. METHOD: This is a prospective observational and analytic study with a sample of 476 patients diagnosed with infantile haemangioma and treated with systemic propranolol during the time interval January 2011 to December 2021. We studied clinical propranolol adverse events experienced in hospital or outpatient and measured the impact of propranolol on blood pressure and heart rate. RESULTS: This study showed that symptomatic adverse events caused by propranolol were mild and severe adverse events were rare. The most common clinical side effects were paleness, sweating, reduced feeding, and agitation. Only in 28 (5.9%) cases these symptoms were severe enough to review treatment, 1.8% had severe respiratory symptoms, 2.7% experienced hypoglycaemia, and 1.2% had heart-related symptoms. Mean blood pressure reduction with treatment was statistically significant only after achieving the maintenance dose 2 mg/kg body weight. Blood pressure under the 5th percentile was registered in 2.9% of cases, but only four patients had symptomatic hypotension. While heart rate reduction was noticed with the first dose, only two experienced symptomatic bradycardia. CONCLUSION: We conclude that propranolol is not only an excellent drug in treating infantile haemangioma, but it has also a very safe profile, with mild side effects and very rare severe cardiac adverse events, easily overcome with treatment interruption.

Safety of oral propranolol for neonates with problematic infantile hemangioma: a retrospective study in an Asian population.

Although the efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangioma (IH) has been well established, clinical data on the safety and tolerability of propranolol in neonates are still lacking. In this work, clinical data of 112 neonates with IH were analyzed retrospectively. All of the patients were evaluated in the hospital at the beginning of the treatment and later in outpatient settings during the treatment. Each time, the following monitoring methods were applied: physical examination, ultrasound echocardiography (UCG), electrocardiography (ECG), blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and basic laboratory tests including blood glucose (BG), liver function, blood potassium, thyroid function. There was a significant reduction in BP and HR at the initiation of treatment. The incidences of bradycardia and hypoglycemia were observed to be increased with the prolong duration of treatment, but not prolonged PR interval. During the course of the therapy, the risk of hyperkalemia and hypothyroidism was reached maximum at the 2 months and 3 months, respectively. Physical growth index including average height, weight and head circumference was not influenced by the treatment. The observed adverse effects were majority mild and only 3 patients needed to rest for 7 days due to severe diarrhea before restarting treatment. This study demonstrated that propranolol is safe and well-tolerated by properly selected young infants with IH. No serious adverse events were observed.

Our experience with propranolol for infantile hemangioma.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The most frequent benign vascular tumor in children is infantile hemangioma (IH). For severe IHs, propranolol has become the first-line Treatment. Despite the fact that several studies have comprehensive therapy regimens, including the best time to start Treatment, dosage, visit frequency, and treatment duration, there is still controversy about the best time to start and stop propranolol medication. METHODS: Between January 2016 and February 2019, dermatologists experienced hemangioma treatment and recommended propranolol treatment for 232 IHs. A total of 90 patients completed the treatment process after undergoing a color Doppler ultrasound test. RESULTS: Propranolol uniquely affects each IH. Ninety patients were divided into two groups in this study: entire regression (n = 40) and partial regression (n = 50). The entire regression group's initial treatment period (4.3 ± 2.97 months) was substantially shorter than the partial regression group's (5.2 ± 4.57 months) (p < 0.05). Between the entire regression group (23.4 ± 12.8 months) and the partial regression group (24.5 ± 16.6 months), there was no significant difference in time to reduce propranolol. The partial regression group (32.9 ± 25.3month) had a lengthier treatment course than the entire regression group (23.4 ± 13.7 months) (p < 0.05). The partial regression group (22%), like the entire regression group, had a higher recurrence rate (5%). The overall proportion of hemangiomas on the face (particularly periocular hemangioma) in the regression group was greater than in the control group. CONCLUSION: The entire regression group's initial treatment time was significantly shorter than the partial regression group's. As a result, as soon as a hemangioma is discovered, it should be treated. To determine the appropriate time to reduce propranolol, we must evaluate the patient's age and the percentage of tumor regression. Periocular hemangioma may have a better prognosis than other types. Given the small number of patients in our study, we will need to do more research in the future to confirm our findings.

Assessing the Risk of Hypoglycemia Secondary to Propranolol Therapy for the Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia in Infants.

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is the most common arrhythmia among infants. Prevention of SVT is frequently managed through propranolol therapy. Hypoglycemia is a known adverse effect of propranolol therapy, but little research has been done on the incidence and risk of hypoglycemia in treatment of SVT in infants with propranolol. This study attempts to offer insight into the risk of hypoglycemia associated with propranolol therapy when treating infantile SVT to help inform future glucose screening guidelines. We conducted a retrospective chart review of infants treated with propranolol in our hospital system. Inclusion criteria were infants < 1 year of age who received propranolol for the treatment of SVT. A total of 63 patients were identified. Data was collected on sex, age, race, diagnosis, gestational age, nutrition source (Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) vs oral), weight (kg), weight for length (kg/cm), propranolol dose (mg/kg/day), comorbidities, and whether or not a hypoglycemic event was identified (< 60 mg/dL). Hypoglycemic events were identified in 9/63 (14.3%) patients. Of the patients with hypoglycemic events, 9/9 (88.9%) had comorbid conditions. Patients with hypoglycemic events had significantly lower weight and propranolol dose than those without hypoglycemic events. Weight for length also tended to increase risk for hypoglycemic events. The high incidence of comorbid conditions in the patients who had hypoglycemic events suggests that hypoglycemic monitoring may only be necessary in patients with conditions predisposing to hypoglycemia.

Indications for surgical resection of complicated infantile hemangiomas in the ß-blocker's era: a single-institution experience from a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to review how the introduction of propranolol as the primary treatment option for children with infantile hemangiomas (IHs) has affected the use of other treatment options at our institution and to determine the indications for surgical treatment of children with IHs in the propranolol era. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a single-center, noncompeting, historical/retrospective cohort study to review all cases referred to the institution for IH evaluation from 2005 to 2020. The authors analyzed the complete charts of patients who received surgery from 2011 to 2020 and evaluated the reasons for each surgical intervention. Detailed descriptive statistics are provided. Logistic regression analysis and Pearson's χ2 -test were applied. RESULTS: During the study period, 592 children received treatment. From 2011, oral propranolol ( n =268; 74%) and surgery ( n =95; 26%) were the only treatments of choice for complicated IH cases. A significant decrease in the frequency of surgical treatment was observed ( P =0.01). The authors identified four main indications for surgical treatment: (1) patients with ulceration and IH size appropriate for surgical resection (15%); (2) patients whose parents preferred surgical treatment (19%); (3) patients who presented late and underwent surgery before the age of three (29%); and (4) patients with sequelae after IH involution and excision after the third year of life (37%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the significant decrease in the need for surgical treatment of children with IHs since the introduction of propranolol, there are still several clear indications for treating IH cases where surgery plays a crucial role.

Bleomycin-triamcinolone sclerotherapy in the management of propranolol resistant infantile hemangioma of the maxillofacial region: A single arm prospective evaluation of clinical outcome and Doppler ultrasound parameters.

INTRODUCTION: Propranolol has emerged as a first line agent in the management of hemangiomas. With increased use of propranolol, studies have also focused on relapses following propranolol therapy. Our current study evaluates the role of bleomycin triamcinolone sclerotherapy for the management of propranolol resistant Infantile Hemangioma (IH). We also evaluated the role color Doppler USG for response assessment of sclerotherapy. METHODS: Patients with Propranolol resistant (Non- responders/ Partial responders) IHs were included in the study. Patients received intralesional bleomycin at a dose of 0.5 IU/kg followed by intralesional injection of triamcinolone at a dose of 2mg/kg body weight. Clinically patients were grouped into excellent, partial and non responders. Doppler parameters; Resistivity index (RI), Pulsatility index(PI) and Peak systolic velocity (PSV) were used to evaluate the response to sclerotherapy. These parameters were evaluated prior to sclerotherapy and 3 months following completion of therapy. The clinical responses of the patients were compared with the change in Doppler parameters before and after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 115 participants were considered for analysis; 60.86% had excellent response, 32.17% had partial response and 6.95% had poor response. There was a significant change in terms of RI, PI and PSV in patients who were either excellent or partial responders. Poor responders did not have a significant change in Doppler parameters. CONCLUSION: Combined bleomycin- triamcinolone sclerotherapy is an effective therapy for the management of propranolol resistant IHs. Doppler parameters RI, PI and PSV are reliable indicators of response in the management of IH.